Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 18:36:16 +0000
Post From: Request for a new ACSIL function
| [2025-09-07 20:51:49] |
| Meklon - Posts: 248 |
|
You can't know the "exact moment", that would require the charts to be updating on each and every tick, rather than on a timer based update.
You can know whether a bar was open on one update and then closed on the next, which is why people are suggesting tracking the index (or the other chart array size). The fact that the chart is remote doesn't really have much bearing on the situation, the method for determining open vs. closed is the same, as is the exactness of determining when the bar closed i.e. you can detect that the state has changed, but not the exact moment that the change occurred (just some time in the last x ms). There is more involved here with respect to my original request than simply determining if the bar is closed or open. Obtaining this status from the remote chart compared to the same chart where the custom study running is entirely different and there is a delay, which is critically impacting the strategy (especially in the case when Renko bar type is involved). The remote chart runs the higher time frame (not necessary time interval) compared to the execution (local) chart with a custom study and the delay in obtaining the close / open bar status from the remote chart is significantly impacting the lead time for the execution instructions on the local chart. I need to be able to obtain the status of open / close bar on the remote chart and use that status as one of the variables in additional calculation on the same remote chart. So far, this functionality is only available on the local chart, NOT on remote. Hence is my original request to add the similar ACSIL function so I could do this on the remote chart. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2025-09-07 20:52:58
|